Yeah, let's not talk about Trump's security guys roughing up protesters and reporters, or Trump saying he wanted to punch a protester in the face to roars of approval from the crowd
What I think you are talking about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugvZu91YHs4
He probably should have been more careful with his language on that one, but he was talking about a situation (he assumed at least) where someone was there to cause violence and throwing punches at people. Now in that situation, should you not be able to use robust force to deal with them?
If anyone is trying to disrupt a political rally, then it's fair enough that they get dragged out. And if they are throwing punches etc., then I really wouldn't have much sympathy for them if they get punched back.
So I don't think Trump said anything that bad in that case, even if his language could be faulted for its tone.
I would say you could find much more dangerous rhetoric on the left when it comes to police shootings or over Israel.
as GotTheGift points out. I don't justify violence from anyone in the political discussion, but for you to claim that violence is a peculiarly left wing thing is a joke
Obviously political violence isn't unique to only one side. But are right wingers trying to disrupt Democrat rallies in the same way?
I don't see that as "free speech" by the way. I see that as one side trying to stop the free speech of the other side. You can have a protest if you want. But you don't need to disrupt what other people are doing.