When you don't specify a specific world view, and just say "atheist", it just seems like you can stuff a straw man as full as you want.
Unintentional strawmen are inevitable when someone is only given opaque, evasive answers after asking direct metaphysical and ethical questions.
I am not implicitly accusing you specifically of doing this. But such practices are common among atheists during discussion and debate, and have been so on these forums for years. There's obviously something disingenuous when someone presents themselves as literally nothing more than "lacking belief in God" during discussions about life's big questions.
What we theists are asking for is not what people do not believe, but what they do believe. We're asking for an actual worldview. Something with content, coherence, and intelligibility that can be argued for. We find it exasperating and disheartening to dialogue with people who have a disputatious and dismissive spirit. Endless expressions of little more than negation, contrarianism, word games, selectively applied scientism, and invincible skepticism are not what we consider to be fair engagements with the arguments we give for our views. Again,
I am not implicitly accusing you specifically of doing this.
So this is a frustration experienced by many theists like myself. Thus I feel compelled to express it in order to raise awareness so that theist-atheist discussions might be more transparent, sincere, and fruitful.