Nah, I need all the help I can get against neopolitan.
...but if you and whateverist want to lurk that's fine.
Take a close look at how my example premisses were treated at reply #210
Premiss - Things have a cause.
Counter premiss - No they don't.
Counter premiss not defended. I'll take that as a win. Premiss - Things are designed
Counter premiss - No they aren't.
Counter premiss simply modified with semantics. Not defended. I'll take that as a win. Premiss - Boeing 747
Counter premiss - whirlwind/junkyard
Counter premiss not defended. Just dismissed as irrelevant/irreverent. I'll take that as a win. Premiss - Shakespearean Sonnet
Counter premiss - a thousand monkeys typing random letters for a thousand years.
Ditto. I'll take that as a win. Premiss - The universe came into existence.
Counter premiss - No it didn't.
Counter premiss not defended. I'll take that as a win. Premiss - Objective moral values have a transcendent quality.
Counter premiss - OMV don't exist.
Counter premiss not defended. Apparently not even understood. I'll take that as a win. Premiss - I experienced a supernatural event. (Just like billions of other humans)
Counter premiss - No you didn't. (Neither did anyone else)
Counter premiss not defended. Apparently the naturalist doesn't know what supernatural means.
I'll take that as a win. Premiss - Jesus appeared to have been Resurrected / Disciples were persecuted for their belief
Counter premiss - Jesus never existed / Disciples were lying.
Counter premiss not fully defended. I'll take that as a win.