...All I did was invite attention to Neo's stuff on WLC.
It's OK
I understand you didn't
write the stuff.
...youre just promoting it.
...I have never once said WLC lies.
You mean never said it here at RF? OK
... I am surprised to have struck such a sensitive nerve with this OP.
I'm not sensitive. I'm inviting anyone who agrees with neos "heavy and scholarly" blog stuff to bring it.
WLC has been called a liar more than once on this forum. (And Ravi Zacharias)
What HASNT happened is any "heavy and scholarly" validating of that accusation.
...Lion, your talk of Neo inevitably getting smacked if he brought his stuff to RFF is intriguing. Neo actually HAS brought his stuff to RFF (See OP.).Perhaps you could start the smackdown with some substance? Or are you going to hide behind pithy?
I said "bring it". (Irenic/Substantive) Are you going to or not?
Logic of an Apologist...Accuses WLC of not understanding how to formulate a basic/valid sylogism.
Sweet Probability...Probability smoke & mirrors. Gobbledygook.
Taxi Ride...thinks there is no such thing as the taxi cab fallacy. Accuses WLC of channeling himself writing/answering his own fan mail. (The problem is, neo's blog has anonymous folks applauding neo.)
WLC's use of quotes...More fixation on WLC's use of the term "taxi cab". Standard quibbling - he said/they said/no he didn't/yes he did.
...blah blah blah.
WLC's Historical Method...Doesn't like WLC using the same widely-used historical methods as other folks.
But if WLC was an atheist/bible skeptic it would be OK.
Thats Not Evidence...neo 'splaining' stuff to newbie counter-apologists in case they accidentally mistake not-evidence for evidence.